Have you been charged with the crime § 18-8-102 18-8-102 Colorado? This is a serious charge and demands immediate legal representation and guidance. The Law Offices of Decker & Jones know how to successfully defend a §18-8-102 18-8-102 Colorado charge in the State of Colorado to protect your innocence.
What to do if Charged?
1. Do not contact the accuser
You may be tempted to contact the accuser to try and resolve the issue directly. Do not contact the accuser. All correspondence before and after the incident can and will be used against you. A lawyer should be representing you in all stages to ensure that nothing hurts the defense case.
2. Do not destroy evidence
You may think that destroying any evidence in your possession will help your defense case. However tampering with evidence will almost always backfire against the defendant. Prosecutors have many resources to recover evidence that you think has been completely destroyed. When the evidence is presented in negotiations or at trial, it will make you look more guilty if you tried to destroy it beforehand. Tampering with evidence is also a crime in itself, which can be added on top of the sentence you could receive for 18-8-102 Colorado
3. Contact an experienced attorney
When you are charged with 18-8-102 Colorado, it is critical to exercise your right to an attorney. Your life is on the line and The Law Offices of Decker & Jones are prepared to defend your case. Contact us immediately at 303-573-5253 – even if you have not been charged yet. You need a defense team working in your corner to combat the prosecution ASAP.
The Basics Of § 18-8-102 18-8-102 Colorado
See below to read the law pertaining to § 18-8-102 18-8-102 Colorado
The Law
Reference the definitions from § 18-8-102 for details on the terminology
Definitions
Decker & Jones will help you understand how the law pertains to your case
Contact Us
§ 18-8-102
(1) A person commits obstructing government operations if he intentionally obstructs, impairs, or hinders the performance of a governmental function by a public servant, by using or threatening to use violence, force, or physical interference or obstacle.
(2) It shall be an affirmative defense that:
(a) The obstruction, impairment, or hindrance was of unlawful action by a public servant; or
(b) The obstruction, impairment, or hindrance was of the making of an arrest; or
(c) The obstruction, impairment, or hindrance of a governmental function was by lawful activities in connection with a labor dispute with the government.
(3) Obstructing government operations is a class 3 misdemeanor.
- R. S. A. § 18-8-102, CO ST § 18-8-102
Current through the end of the First Regular Session of the 73rd General Assembly (2021).
§ 18-8-101 Definitions
As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) “Government” has the same meaning as described in section 18-1-901(3)(i).
(2) “Governmental function” has the same meaning as described in section 18-1-901(3)(j).
(2.5) “Peace officer” has the same meaning as described in section 16-2.5-101, C.R.S.
(3) “Public servant” has the same meaning as described in section 18-1-901(3)(o).
Free Legal Consultation Regarding Charge § 18-8-102 18-8-102 Colorado
To benefit from nearly three decades of combined legal experience at Decker & Jones, simply fill out the form below or call our Denver or Golden offices at 303-573-5253.
You will receive a call back within two hours and you will speak to a lawyer on the same business day.
Case formally dismissed
“Doubtless there are few events in the life of a family that can compare with its being informed totally unexpectedly that one of its members has been accused of a crime of sexual assault. And that such a charge is considered legally to be a felony and punishable potentially by a term of imprisonment. To say my wife and I, and our son, were stunned, first at the time of the charge against him, and later, when we were informed that imprisonment was a very real possibility in this instance, is to minimize how profound was the distress each of us felt. Clear to us all straightaway was that a proper and robust legal defense against the claim of wrongdoing by my son was imperative. Whomever we sought for the defense attorney for him should have extensive experience in this assault classification, the depth of insight necessary to sift through and prioritize the host of factors both typical of and unique to my son’s case, and the wisdom to formulate a compelling defense of him based on due consideration of those factors. Nothing less than striving for an unassailable counter to the charge would suit. Such a person, and persons,
More Testimonials
Free Legal Consultation Call 303-573-5253
We understand the urgency. You will speak to a lawyer on the same business day as your call.
Contact